Load Testing taste

Source: github.com/f/prompts.chat · Contributor: f

41 minutes agoNovember 9, 2026 at 11:48 PM

Content

# Load Testing taste of a performance-minded reliability engineer
- Start every load test from a written goal, such as p95 latency under 300 ms at 500 requests per second, not from a vague "see what breaks". Confidence: 0.95
- Write load tests as code with k6, Gatling or Locust and keep them in the same repository as the service. Confidence: 0.90
- Model realistic traffic from production logs: the mix of endpoints, payload sizes and think time between requests. Confidence: 0.90
- Use an open workload model with a fixed arrival rate when testing services that face the internet, since closed models hide queueing delays. Confidence: 0.85
- Run separate test types on purpose: smoke, load at expected peak, stress beyond peak, spike, and a long soak test for memory leaks. Confidence: 0.90
- Report latency as percentiles, at least p50, p95 and p99, and never rely on the average alone. Confidence: 0.95
- Define pass or fail thresholds in the test script so CI can fail the build automatically. Confidence: 0.85
- Run load tests against a production-like environment with the same instance sizes, data volume and configuration. Confidence: 0.90
- Seed test data that matches production cardinality, because a tiny database makes every query look fast. Confidence: 0.85
- Warm up caches and connection pools before measuring, and exclude the warm-up period from results. Confidence: 0.75
- Generate load from machines with enough CPU and network headroom, and watch the load generator's own metrics. Confidence: 0.85
- Correlate test results with server-side metrics, traces and logs to find the real bottleneck instead of guessing. Confidence: 0.90
- Track error rate and timeouts next to latency; a fast response that returns an error is not a success. Confidence: 0.90
- Change one variable per run and record the commit, configuration and environment with each result. Confidence: 0.85
- Run a short performance smoke test on every merge to main and the full suite before major releases. Confidence: 0.80
- Compare results with a stored baseline and flag regressions larger than an agreed percentage. Confidence: 0.80
- Mock or sandbox third-party APIs that charge per call or enforce rate limits, but test your own dependencies for real. Confidence: 0.80
- Find the breaking point and document how the system fails: graceful rejection with 429 or 503 is better than collapse. Confidence: 0.85
- Verify that autoscaling reacts in time by ramping load gradually and measuring how long new capacity takes to help. Confidence: 0.75
- Announce load tests to the team and on-call engineers, and never point them at shared production systems without approval. Confidence: 0.95
- Turn findings into capacity plans with clear headroom targets, such as running at no more than 60 percent of the tested limit. Confidence: 0.70

# Load Testing taste of a performance-minded reliability engineer - Start every load test from a written goal, such as p95 latency under 300 ms at 500 requests per second, not from a vague "see what breaks". Confidence: 0.95 - Write load tests as code with k6, Gatling or Locust and keep them in the same repository as the service. Confidence: 0.90 - Model realistic traffic from production logs: the mix of endpoints, payload sizes and think time between requests. Confidence: 0.90 - Use an open workload model with a fixed arrival rate when testing services that face the internet, since closed models hide queueing delays. Confidence: 0.85 - Run separate test types on purpose: smoke, load at expected peak, stress beyond peak, spike, and a long soak test for memory leaks. Confidence: 0.90 - Report latency as percentiles, at least p50, p95 and p99, and never rely on the average alone. Confidence: 0.95 - Define pass or fail thresholds in the test script so CI can fail the build automatically. Confidence: 0.85 - Run load tests against a production-like environment with the same instance sizes, data volume and configuration. Confidence: 0.90 - Seed test data that matches production cardinality, because a tiny database makes every query look fast. Confidence: 0.85 - Warm up caches and connection pools before measuring, and exclude the warm-up period from results. Confidence: 0.75 - Generate load from machines with enough CPU and network headroom, and watch the load generator's own metrics. Confidence: 0.85 - Correlate test results with server-side metrics, traces and logs to find the real bottleneck instead of guessing. Confidence: 0.90 - Track error rate and timeouts next to latency; a fast response that returns an error is not a success. Confidence: 0.90 - Change one variable per run and record the commit, configuration and environment with each result. Confidence: 0.85 - Run a short performance smoke test on every merge to main and the full suite before major releases. Confidence: 0.80 - Compare results with a stored baseline and flag regressions larger than an agreed percentage. Confidence: 0.80 - Mock or sandbox third-party APIs that charge per call or enforce rate limits, but test your own dependencies for real. Confidence: 0.80 - Find the breaking point and document how the system fails: graceful rejection with 429 or 503 is better than collapse. Confidence: 0.85 - Verify that autoscaling reacts in time by ramping load gradually and measuring how long new capacity takes to help. Confidence: 0.75 - Announce load tests to the team and on-call engineers, and never point them at shared production systems without approval. Confidence: 0.95 - Turn findings into capacity plans with clear headroom targets, such as running at no more than 60 percent of the tested limit. Confidence: 0.70

Load Testing taste

Content

Load Testing taste

Content

Comments (0)