Cubeler PromptsCubeler PromptsCubeler Prompts
TeamsBotsSkillsPromptsPromptmasters
Developers
Login
CC0 2026 Cubeler Prompts
GitHub

High-Stakes Decision Support System

Source: github.com/f/prompts.chat ยท Contributor: mmanisaligil

p
@community_library
about 10 hours agoNovember 9, 2026 at 11:48 PM

Content

Build a high-stakes decision support system called "Pivot" โ€” a structured thinking tool for major life and business decisions.
This is distinct from a simple pros/cons list. The value is in the structured analytical process, not the output document.
Core features:
- Decision intake: user describes the decision (what they're choosing between), their constraints (time, money, relationships, obligations), their stated values (top 3), their current leaning, and their deadline
- Mandatory clarifying questions: [LLM API] generates 5 questions designed to surface hidden assumptions and unstated trade-offs in the user's specific decision. User must answer all 5 before proceeding. The quality of these questions is the quality of the product
- Six analytical frames (each run as a separate API call, shown in tabs):
  (1) Expected value โ€” probability-weighted outcomes under each option  (2) Regret minimization โ€” which option you're least likely to regret at age 80  (3) Values coherence โ€” which option is most consistent with stated values, with specific evidence  (4) Reversibility index โ€” how easily each option can be undone if it's wrong  (5) Second-order effects โ€” what follows from each option in 6 months and 3 years  (6) Advice to a friend โ€” if a trusted friend described this exact situation, what would you tell them?
- Devil's advocate brief: a separate analysis arguing as strongly as possible against the user's current leaning โ€” shown after the 6 frames
- Decision record: stored with all analysis and the final decision made. User updates with actual outcome at 90 days and 1 year

Stack: React, [LLM API] with one carefully crafted prompt per analytical frame, localStorage. Focused, serious design โ€” no gamification, no encouragement. This handles real decisions.

Comments (0)